Imported from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills (
skills/clarvia-aeo-check/SKILL.md). Install upstream withnpx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill clarvia-aeo-check. Copyright stays with the author.
Clarvia AEO Check
Overview
When the user selects Clarvia, use its current index and scoring model as advisory input. Do not make a vendor score a mandatory prerequisite or security approval. Clarvia describes tools across four AEO dimensions: API accessibility, data structuring, agent compatibility, and trust signals.
Prerequisites
Add Clarvia MCP server to your config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"clarvia": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["--yes", "clarvia-mcp-server@<reviewed-version>"]
}
}
}
When to Use This Skill
- Use when evaluating a new MCP server before adding it to your config
- Use when comparing two tools for the same job
- Use when building an agent that selects tools dynamically
- Use when you want to find the highest-quality tool in a category
How It Works
Step 1: Score a specific tool
Ask Claude to score any tool by URL or name:
Score https://github.com/example/my-mcp-server for agent-readiness
Clarvia returns a 0-100 AEO score with breakdown across four dimensions.
Step 2: Search tools by category
Find the top-rated database MCP servers using Clarvia
Returns provider-ranked results; record query date, index coverage and scoring limitations rather than a hardcoded total.
Step 3: Compare tools head-to-head
Compare supabase-mcp vs firebase-mcp using Clarvia
Returns side-by-side score breakdown with a recommendation.
Step 4: Check leaderboard
Show me the top 10 MCP servers for authentication using Clarvia
Examples
Example 1: Evaluate before installing
Before I add this MCP server to my config, score it:
https://github.com/example/new-tool
Use the clarvia aeo_score tool and tell me if it's agent-ready.
Example 2: Find best tool in category
I need an MCP server for web scraping. Use Clarvia to find the
top-rated options and compare the top 3.
Example 3: CI/CD quality gate
Optional example for an explicitly requested advisory CI integration; verify the action’s repository, inputs and immutable revision before use:
- uses: clarvia-project/clarvia-action@<reviewed-full-commit-SHA>
with:
url: https://your-api.com
fail-under: 70
AEO Score Interpretation
| Score | Rating | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Agent Native | Built specifically for agent use |
| 70-89 | Agent Friendly | Works well, minor gaps |
| 50-69 | Agent Compatible | Works but needs improvement |
| 30-49 | Agent Partial | Significant limitations |
| 0-29 | Provider low score | Inspect the actual gaps and task fit; this is not an eligibility ban |
Best Practices
- ✅ Score tools before adding them to long-running agent workflows
- ✅ Use Clarvia's leaderboard to discover alternatives you haven't considered
- ✅ Re-check scores periodically — tools improve over time
- ✅ Compare scores with actual protocol compatibility, required functionality and source/security review; scoring is optional
- ❌ Don't use tools scoring below 50 in production agent pipelines without understanding the limitations
Common Pitfalls
-
Problem: Clarvia returns "not found" for a tool Solution: Try scanning by URL directly with
aeo_score— Clarvia will score it on-demand -
Problem: Score seems low for a tool I trust Solution: Use
get_score_breakdownto see which dimensions are weak and decide if they matter for your use case
Related Skills
@mcp-builder- Build a new MCP server that scores well on AEO@agent-evaluation- Broader agent quality evaluation framework
Limitations
- Do not add an MCP host entry or mandatory CI threshold merely to read this guide. Tool lookup/URL scanning sends data to the provider; confirm scope before sending private endpoints or triggering active scans. A 0–100 score is neither a vulnerability audit nor permission to install/execute a tool.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
