90 days of the enterprise, pro and team plans free, no card needed. See the plans
Model comparison
Upstage's Solar Pro 4 against Z.ai's GLM 5.3 Flash: vendor list prices, limits, abilities and the Artificial Analysis indexes side by side - and what OpenSmartRoute does when both are available.
GLM 5.3 Flash lists at $0.237 per million tokens blended against $0.262 for Solar Pro 4.
GLM 5.3 Flash scores 42 on the intelligence index against 28 - 14 points apart.
GLM 5.3 Flash scores 72 on the coding index against 53 - 19 points apart.
GLM 5.3 Flash reads 1.0M tokens at once, Solar Pro 4 524k.
only GLM 5.3 Flash offers image input, open weights.
Vendor list prices per million tokens and published limits; indexes are Artificial Analysis composites (0-100).
| Specification | Solar Pro 4 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.26 | $0.24 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.03 |
| Context window | 524K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 131K | 944K |
| Input | text | text, image, video |
| Output | text | text |
| Tool calls | ||
| Structured output | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Open weights | ||
| Intelligence index | 28 | 42 |
| Coding index | 53 | 72 |
| Agentic index | - | 51 |
| Released | Aug 10, 2026 | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Available on this deployment |
List price times tokens for three typical workloads; your mix of input and output decides which model's pricing suits you.
| Workload | Solar Pro 4 | GLM 5.3 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support chat20M tokens in, 5M out a month - a help desk answering a few thousand conversations. | $6.00 | $5.50 | $0.50 less on GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Document summaries100M in, 5M out - long inputs, short answers. | $18.00 | $17.50 | $0.50 less on GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Coding assistant60M in, 20M out - a team's editor assistant, output-heavy. | $21.00 | $19.00 | $2.00 less on GLM 5.3 Flash |
GLM 5.3 Flash is both cheaper and stronger on the intelligence index, so with both in the catalogue the router sends it almost everything; Solar Pro 4 earns a request only on something it alone offers - a longer context, a modality, a data boundary or a region your rules require.
# targets.yaml - both models as routing targets (metadata.model links each to the catalogue entry)
targets:
- { id: glm-5.3-flash, kind: llm, metadata: { model: z-ai/glm-5.3-flash } }
- { id: solar-pro4, kind: llm, metadata: { model: upstage/solar-pro4 } }
# rules.yaml - the cheaper model by default, the stronger one when the request is hard
rules:
- name: simple-requests-stay-cheap
when: { max_complexity: 0.45 }
prefer: [glm-5.3-flash]
weight: 0.8
- name: hard-requests-escalate
when: { min_complexity: 0.45 }
prefer: [solar-pro4]
weight: 0.8Every Upstage and Z.ai model, with prices, is on the vendor pages; the rankings show what the router actually picks.